Oil and gas projects frequently involve distinct ownership structures, primarily royalty interests and working interests. Royalty owners receive a cost-free fraction of production revenue, bearing no drilling or operational expenses. Working interest owners pay for drilling, completion, and daily expenses but can access a larger share of net revenue once royalties and overriding royalties are satisfied. The post, drawing on Nick Slavin’s Investing in Oil and Gas Wells, clarifies that each model suits different investor goals. Royalty interests appeal to those preferring stable income with minimal liability, while working interest holders accept more risk for higher potential reward. Detailed discussions of overriding royalties (ORRIs) round out the ownership picture, showing how landowners or third parties can carve out cost-free revenue shares. By balancing cost obligations against revenue shares, high-net-worth investors choose a structure that aligns with their risk tolerance, tax strategy, and desire for direct involvement in oil and gas drilling investments.
If you are researching oil and gas working interest ownership, you are usually trying to answer a simple question that has a lot of hidden detail behind it:
What do I actually own, what do I actually owe, and how do I actually get paid?
In our experience, most disappointment in oil and gas investing does not come from one bad month of pricing or a normal decline curve. It comes from investors choosing a structure that does not match their expectations. The biggest point of confusion is almost always the same: people mix up royalty interests in oil and gas with working interests, or assume that a “non-operating” position means passive.
It does not.
This guide is built to do three things:
We are not here to hype one structure over the other. We believe responsible investing starts with clarity. When you understand what you are buying, the odds of a good investor experience go up sharply.
People say “oil and gas investing” like it is a single category. It is not. There are multiple ways to invest in energy, and each has its own risk profile.
For example:
The right approach depends on what you are trying to accomplish. Someone seeking passive exposure is usually not looking for the same structure as someone seeking active ownership, potential tax categories tied to drilling costs, or direct well economics.
This page focuses on the two ownership structures investors most often compare in the private space:
A working interest is direct ownership in a lease and the wells drilled on that lease. If you own a working interest, you are participating in the project economics as a cost-bearing owner.
As a working interest owner, you are generally responsible for your proportional share of:
In return, you receive your proportional share of production revenue after royalties and other burdens are paid.
Here is the simplest way we can say it:
A working interest is ownership with responsibility.
That responsibility is not just a technical detail. It is the entire point of the structure. It is also why working interests can offer deeper economic participation than a royalty interest.
A royalty interest is a right to receive a defined fraction of production revenue. Royalty owners typically do not bear the costs of drilling and operating the well.
Royalty interests are often associated with mineral ownership. A mineral owner leases their minerals to an operator and receives a royalty in exchange. Investors can also acquire royalty interests through private transactions, depending on availability and market.
When people say royalty is “cost-free,” they mean:
That is real. It is also why investing in royalties oil and gas can feel simpler from a cash flow perspective.
But “cost-free” does not mean risk-free. Royalty income still depends on:
Royalty interests can be a great fit for investors who want exposure without cost obligations. They can also frustrate investors who expect steady checks forever or who assume royalties cannot decline.
If you only remember one section, make it this one.
This is why “which is better” is not the right question.
The right question is:
Which structure matches what you are trying to accomplish and what you are willing to take on?
Oil and gas revenue distribution is not intuitive if you are new to the space. Many investors assume it works like this:
“Well produces, revenue comes in, I get my percentage.”
In reality, there is a waterfall, and your ownership type determines where you sit in that waterfall.
Here is the simplified flow:
If you own a working interest, your check is not based on gross production. It is based on net revenue after burdens, and then it is affected by ongoing operating expenses.
This is one of the most common reasons working interest investors feel surprised early on, especially if they expected royalty-like payments.
Before you invest in any working interest oil and gas opportunity, you should understand one key concept:
NRI, net revenue interest.
NRI is the share of production revenue that is available to you after royalties and other burdens are paid.
Two deals can advertise the same working interest percentage and have very different NRIs because:
The practical takeaway is simple:
If you do not understand your NRI, you do not understand what you are buying.
We recommend investors always ask for clear disclosure on royalty burdens and any overriding royalties. Heavy burdens are not automatically wrong, but they must be understood. When economics are diluted without transparency, investors lose trust, and outcomes suffer.
A lot of investors search for “non operated working interest” or “non operating working interest oil and gas” because they want to understand whether they are expected to run anything.
Most of the time, the answer is no. Most individual investors participate as non-operating owners.
A non-operating working interest generally means:
The operator drills the well, completes the well, manages vendors, handles compliance, and runs field operations.
What non-operating does not mean is passive.
If you own a working interest, operated or non-operated, you are still a cost-bearing owner. You are still exposed to the outcomes of execution, cost control, and well performance.
This is one of the most important clarifications in the entire oil and gas investing world.
Non-operating describes who runs the operation. It does not remove responsibility for costs.
This matters for expectations.
In both structures, working interests share in costs and share in the net revenue after burdens. The difference is who is doing the work and making the operational calls.
For investors who value simplicity but want working interest economics, non-operating participation is often the middle ground. It still requires understanding. It just does not require you to run a drilling program personally.
Here is a decision-support comparison that reflects how these structures feel in real life, not how they look in a glossary.
Both structures depend on operator competence, but working interest owners typically feel the impact more directly because execution and cost discipline drive the net economics.
Royalty owners generally have no operational control. Working interest owners may have varying levels of rights depending on agreements, but non-operating owners typically are not making daily decisions.
A lot of investors enter oil and gas seeking monthly income. That is reasonable. What is not reasonable is assuming all monthly income behaves the same way.
Royalty owners begin receiving income once the well is producing and sales are flowing. There is no drilling cost burden to recover from the royalty owner’s side.
Royalty payments can still fluctuate, but the structure is simpler.
Working interest owners fund the project before drilling. Once production begins, revenue is net of burdens and affected by operating expenses.
Working interest checks can be strong early, then decline as production declines. They can also be affected by maintenance events and workovers. That is normal. Wells are physical assets.
The best way to approach working interest cash flow is as an operating asset, not a bond. When investors treat it like a bond, they often get frustrated. When they treat it like ownership in a producing asset with real-world variability, expectations align.
Every oil and gas structure has risk. The key is understanding where the risk lives.
Even in proven fields, reservoirs vary. Offsets and historical production reduce uncertainty, but they do not eliminate it. The question is not “is there risk,” the question is “how well is risk managed through project selection and execution.”
A well can have good geology and still underperform due to poor drilling, poor completion decisions, or poor operational planning.
Costs can change. Service markets tighten. Complications happen. Equipment costs rise. A disciplined operator manages this through planning, vendor relationships, and cost control.
Wells can experience downtime, equipment failures, or the need for maintenance and workovers. That is part of operating physical assets.
Prices move. Costs do not disappear when prices fall. This is where working interest owners feel the difference most sharply, because lower prices compress net revenue while expenses continue.
This includes integrity, transparency, communication, and cost discipline. In our view, operator risk is often the most underestimated risk, especially for investors who have been burned before. Good operators communicate clearly, manage costs, and do not hide behind marketing language when reality gets messy.
Taxes are a major reason many investors research working interests. That is fine, but it has to be framed correctly.
The simplest truth is:
Tax treatment follows economic responsibility.
Working interest owners bear drilling and operating costs, which is why working interests are generally treated as active ownership. That active classification is why certain categories may be available in working interest structures, depending on how the investment is set up and your personal tax situation.
Royalty owners generally do not bear those costs, which is why royalty interests are usually treated differently.
We strongly recommend two practical steps:
Taxes are powerful when understood. They are dangerous when used as the sole reason to invest.
Here is a plain-English way to decide between royalty interest vs working interest.
There is nothing wrong with preferring royalties. There is also nothing wrong with preferring working interests. The only wrong move is choosing based on assumptions.
If you want to reduce your chances of a bad experience, this is where you focus. Due diligence is not about being suspicious. It is about being responsible.
Ask:
Ask:
Ask:
The quality of answers to these questions tells you a lot about the operator and the culture behind the deal.
We see the same misunderstandings repeatedly across the industry.
No. Non-operating means you do not run the well. You still share in costs and risk.
No. Deductions affect tax treatment and timing. They do not guarantee performance or eliminate operational risk.
Royalties can decline as wells decline. Many investors underestimate how normal decline impacts long-term income.
Structure matters, but operator discipline and communication often matter more. A good structure run poorly is still a poor outcome.
No. It is typically cost-free in the sense that you do not pay drilling and operating costs, but royalty payments can fluctuate with production, prices, and downtime.
No. Many investors participate as non-operating owners. The operator runs the well, while you participate economically.
Because it reflects the revenue you actually receive after burdens. It is one of the clearest indicators of dilution in a deal.
A working interest can generate monthly distributions once producing, but it is generally not “passive” in the same way a royalty interest is, because the owner bears costs and the cash flow can be affected by operational events.
Neither is universally better. The right answer depends on your goals, risk tolerance, desired involvement, and how the opportunity is structured.
Oil and gas investing can make sense for the right investor. It can also go sideways quickly when investors do not understand what they own.
Royalty interests can provide cost-free participation in production revenue, with simpler ownership and fewer obligations. Working interests offer deeper economic participation, but they come with responsibility. A working interest oil and gas position is not something you choose casually.
The best investors do three things:
If you do those three things, you put yourself in a far better position to make a decision you can feel good about.
The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal or tax advice. We are not licensed CPAs, and readers should consult a qualified CPA or tax professional to address their specific tax situations and ensure compliance with applicable laws.

Preston Bass is the founder of Bass Energy Exploration (BassEXP) and an experienced operator in the private oil and gas sector. He helps accredited investors evaluate working-interest energy projects with a focus on disciplined execution, cost control, and transparent reporting. Preston also hosts the ONG Report (Oil & Natural Gas Report), where he breaks down complex oil and gas investing topics—including tax considerations and deal structure—into clear, practical insights.
Read Full Bio

After funding, site prep and drilling commence, then the rig releases to completion crews. Completions typically take one to five weeks. First sales occur once facilities are ready and pipeline or trucking is scheduled.
Projects comply with Oklahoma Corporation Commission rules on spacing, completions, and water handling. Engineering and well control standards are built into planning and execution.
The operator maintains lean corporate overhead so more capital goes into the well. Contracts target predictable drilling and completion cycles to protect returns.
Expect an AFE that details capital, a Joint Operating Agreement that governs project decisions, and ongoing statements covering volumes, prices, and LOE. Tax reporting is delivered annually.
Distributions are based on Net Revenue Interest (NRI), not just working‑interest percentage. NRI equals WI × (1 − royalty burden). Revenues are paid after royalties and operating costs.
Projects are offered to accredited investors and require a suitability review. A brief questionnaire confirms status before documents are provided.
Yes. Management participates in each program at the same level as investors, which strengthens alignment on cost discipline and capital efficiency.
Geoscientists confirm source, reservoir, seal, and trap, integrate offset well data, and apply 3D seismic to map targets. Only after this de‑risking does a prospect advance to spud.
Current projects focus on Oklahoma, including historically productive counties where modern technology can unlock remaining value. Local regulation and established infrastructure support efficient development.
Provides direct access to drilling projects, aligns capital by co‑investing, maintains low overhead, and emphasizes transparent reporting. The firm is independently owned and family operated.
Confirm accredited status, review a project’s AFE and geology, and subscribe to a direct participation program that fits your goals and risk tolerance. Expect a Joint Operating Agreement to govern rights and duties.
Direct participation can pair attractive after‑tax cash flow with ownership of a tangible, domestic asset. The structure aims to reduce risk through modern geology, focused basins, and careful cost control.
Three core benefits drive after‑tax returns:
Either buy futures and ETFs or acquire a working interest in a well. A working interest ties returns to actual barrels produced and passes through powerful deductions.
Consider diversified ETFs or mutual funds for low minimums and liquidity. Direct interests often require higher checks and longer holding periods.
Choose indirect exposure through public markets or direct participation in specific wells. Direct participation gives you working‑interest ownership, cash flow from sales, and access to tax benefits.
Public options include energy stocks and ETFs. Direct programs are private placements where you fund drilling and completion and receive your share of revenues and deductions.
It can be attractive when you want real‑asset exposure, cash flow potential, and tax efficiency. It also carries geological, operational, price, and liquidity risks. Model both pre‑tax and after‑tax cases.
After a well is drilled and completed, oil and gas flow to the surface through production tubing and surface equipment. Output starts high, then declines over time.
Subsurface work and leasing can run months or longer. Drilling and completion often require weeks to a few months. Completions alone commonly take one to five weeks after the rig moves off location.
Teams map the subsurface with gravity, magnetic, and 3D seismic data, lease minerals, and drill to prove hydrocarbons. Only a well confirms commercial volumes.
Exploration identifies drill‑ready prospects using geoscience and seismic. Production begins once completions and facilities are in place, and continues through primary, secondary, and sometimes tertiary recovery.